Jump to content


Photo

Hammerers And Shields

hammerer shield

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Yorri Damminson

Yorri Damminson

    Dwarf Longbeard

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 07:55 PM

With our previous armybook people fielded them in large units (28+), but now a lot us use them in smaller units (12-24). Do you find giving them shields for some extra protection versus shooting (and magic) helpful (or even a must)?



#2 Kinks

Kinks

    Dwarf Warrior

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 146 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 08:04 PM

Normally I have them covered by a Grungi.  So I don't really see that it is necessary.  People want to shoot at them...sure.  But then, I'm shooting back.  And I know who will win in a shootout.



#3 Murphey

Murphey

    Dwarf Lord

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,055 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 08:46 PM

I am building a unit of 14 as a flank support/ banner caddy. It's actually worth it at that point size.

#4 Wendersnaven

Wendersnaven

    Dwarf Lord

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,874 posts

Posted 30 April 2014 - 02:44 AM

I've only done disposable tens so far, so no. The save is mighty handy against missile fire, but most massed missiles are merely strength three, minus all the misses. (Alliteration is awsome.) If 9th edition allows them to choose bewteen HW&S or the GWpns then I would say it's an auto-include.



#5 Chase

Chase

    Dwarf Longbeard

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 505 posts
Contributor

Posted 30 April 2014 - 07:17 PM

I never give them shields, they are too expensive anyway - especially since current ETC rules limit single unit cost to 450 points. MR of Grungi should be enough :)



#6 Salgar

Salgar

    Dwarf Longbeard

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 350 posts

Posted 30 April 2014 - 07:31 PM

If 9th edition allows them to choose bewteen HW&S or the GWpns then I would say it's an auto-include.


This. I never give my Hammerers shields, but if this happens I will every time.

#7 kgkid

kgkid

    Dwarf King

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,006 posts

Posted 30 April 2014 - 07:55 PM

I think that smaller units of Hammerers are the new way to go. I just can't seem to cross over to that in a way it would give me security in may battles.

 

In smaller units Shields might be a good way to give them some more endurance from ranged attacks.

 

In bigger units, specially with ETC restrictions in mind, it becomes a commodity I can not afford, just as Chase said.

 

If the 9th edition ... well, I do not like daydreaming about it. I can only say that in 7th and 6th I used shields on Hammerers, and I seldom had their great weapons see the battle.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: hammerer, shield

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users