9 replies to this topic

[Lord Anvilarm]

Hi All,

 

I want to make sure I understand the maximum number of Spellbreaker Runes a single Runesmith can take.

 

I believe the Runesmith can legally take one Spellbreaker Rune magic item and one magic item containing a Spellbreaker Rune and a Rune of Furnace for a total of two Spellbreakers.

 

You can't just take one magic item with two Spellbreakers on it because it becomes Spelleater Rune.

 

Do people agree with that?

 

Anvilarm

[St Hasselhoff]

No, because you can only have a single magic talisman, so no doubling up I'm afraid.

[Silvergrip]

If you were allowed to take a second talisman this would be entirely legit. Unfortunately you are only allowed one of each type of magic item, talismans included.

[Lord Anvilarm]

That is exactly what i was wondering. Thanks. So it is two Rune Smiths to get two Spellbreakers with one of them adding a Rune of the Furnace. 

[silverback]

That is exactly what i was wondering. Thanks. So it is two Rune Smiths to get two Spellbreakers with one of them adding a Rune of the Furnace. 

 

Exactly

[Kinks]

It's not the two talisman's that is the problem here.

 

Its the 'Rule of Three'.  You cannot have more than three runes on one item.  In the rules for Rune of Spellbreaking, a third rune has no effect.

[marky]

It's not the two talisman's that is the problem here.

 

Its the 'Rule of Three'.  You cannot have more than three runes on one item.  In the rules for Rune of Spellbreaking, a third rune has no effect.

 

and all the 2nd one does is give a 50% chance they will forget the spell

[Hoffa]

Speaking of which, what happens when you spellbreak a bound spell, the language about the boundspell being destroyed on 6+ is no longer present. Does this means that boundspells are now destroyed on 4+ as well ?

[Thrundorin]

Good qn Hoffa, I would talk it through with the opponant, my first though was to follow the miscast split.

 

If it is a bound spell item, the item is destroyed;

If it is a bound spell innate ability it just doesnt work this turn. 

 

given that it causes wizards to forget what they know for a while, I would assume that on a 4+ the spell is gone bound spell or otherwise. 

[Thanechuck]

If you really want a second rune, a second runesmith is not that big an investment.  considering he attacks like a 2nd str 4 champion, give his unit armor piercing AND MR1  He's really a very good choice points willing.